VerifyAI Request an assessment
VerifyAI
Request an assessment

Prove that the AIyou already runis defensible.

Independent AI audits, red teaming and governance frameworks for Malaysia's regulated sectors.

01 — Position

Malaysia is turning AI oversight into an obligation. Adoption has moved faster than governance.

Organisations across the country are already running AI in decisions that affect customers. Far fewer can show, on paper, how those systems are governed, who owns the risk, or what has been tested. That gap is what we close.

Practice
AI risk assessment, compliance audit and responsible AI integration
Built for
Malaysian enterprises, financial institutions and government-linked companies
Founded by
Raymond Teo, a practising Chief Information Security Officer
Based in
Cyberjaya, Selangor
02 — The landscape

What your AI is going to be measured against.

We map your systems to the instruments that actually bind your sector — national and international.

MY

National AI Office (NAIO)

Malaysia's coordinating body for national AI governance, and the direction your internal policy will be read against.

MY

National AI Action Plan 2026–2030

Sets the national trajectory for AI adoption and oversight across regulated and government-linked sectors.

MY

MY-AI Standards

The emerging national standards work stewarded with CyberSecurity Malaysia — the reference your controls get mapped to.

MY

Personal Data Protection Act

Governs the personal data your models are trained on, prompted with, and infer from. Amendments tighten accountability.

INTL

ISO/IEC 42001

The international management-system standard for AI. The clearest way to evidence governance to a board or an auditor.

EXTRA‑TERR.

EU AI Act

Reaches Malaysian firms whose AI outputs are used in the EU — obligations follow the deployment, not the office.

Also mapped — NIST AI RMF · MITRE ATLAS · OECD AI Principles

03 — Services

Four ways we make AI oversight evidenced.

AI audit and compliance readiness

We evaluate your machine-learning systems against Malaysian data-protection obligations and recognised AI governance standards, then tell you plainly where evidence is missing.

Assessment · evidence review · gap register

Adversarial stress-testing of live and pre-deployment models for bias, prompt injection, data leakage, security flaws and hallucination risk — documented as findings you can act on.

Adversarial testing · findings report · retest

We design the internal policy that makes oversight real: human-in-the-loop review points, transparent data flows, model inventory, and clear ownership of AI risk.

Policy · operating model · model inventory

Structured training for the compliance officers, risk teams and engineers who have to run the framework after we hand it over.

Training · enablement · certification support
04 — Evidence

A finding is only useful if someone can act on it.

This is the shape of a VerifyAI red-team finding: what we probed, what the system actually did, and the control that closed it.

Specimen 01 — Retail banking assistant
Probe
Indirect prompt injection via an uploaded statement PDF
Observed
Assistant surfaced content from a prior session's context window
Control applied
Per-session context isolation and an output entity filter
Specimen 02 — Claims triage model
Probe
Proxy-variable bias sweep across postcode and applicant age
Observed
Approval rates diverged by postcode after protected fields were removed
Control applied
Fairness constraint at threshold, with documented rationale

Illustrative specimens, shown to demonstrate reporting format. Not client data.

Find out which obligations you cannot yet evidence.

Six questions. Your result is shown immediately — no email required.

05 — Readiness check · approx. 2 minutes
06 — Sectors

Where accountability is not optional.

01

Banking & capital markets

Model risk management, credit and fraud decisioning, customer-facing assistants.

02

Insurance

Underwriting and claims models where an adverse decision has to be explainable.

03

Healthcare

Clinical and administrative AI operating on the most sensitive category of personal data.

04

Government-linked companies

Public accountability, procurement scrutiny and national standards alignment.

05

Technology & platforms

Firms shipping AI features into regulated customers' environments.

07 — Scope of engagement

What we do, and what we will not claim.

What you get
What we do not offer
An independent assessment of the AI you actually run.
A guarantee of compliance. No one can honestly offer that.
Findings written so your board and your regulator can both read them.
A certificate, a badge, or an accreditation we issue ourselves.
Red-team evidence that a control works — or does not.
Legal advice. We work alongside your counsel, not in place of them.
A framework your own team can operate after we leave.
A permanent dependency on us to keep your AI governed.
08 — Enquiry

Start with a scoping conversation.

Tell us what you are running and where you feel exposed. We will come back with what an assessment would cover.

OfficeCyberjaya, Selangor
EntityVerifyAI Malaysia Solutions Sdn. Bhd.
PracticeAI assurance & governance

We will only use these details to respond to your enquiry.

Enquire